<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>@ the intersection of people &#38; technology &#187; trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markgammon.com/tag/trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markgammon.com</link>
	<description>Sociology &#124; Technology &#124; Education &#124; Innovation &#124; Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Reputation Systems&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.markgammon.com/2009/10/twitter-reputation-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markgammon.com/2009/10/twitter-reputation-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markgammon.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We are working on reputation systems &#8230; You may not know someone is trustworthy, but other people who are trustworthy trust them.&#8221;One of the challenges, he said, is the balance between anonymity &#8212; anyone can create a twitter account &#8212; and reliability. He noted that anonymity was key to the Iranians posting images and news]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="posterous_bookmarklet_entry">
<blockquote class="posterous_medium_quote"><p>&#8220;We are working on reputation systems &#8230; You may not know someone is trustworthy, but other people who are trustworthy trust them.&#8221;One of the challenges, he said, is the balance between anonymity &#8212; anyone can create a twitter account &#8212; and reliability. He noted that anonymity was key to the Iranians posting images and news of the government crackdown.</p>
<p>&#8220;Anonymity was a key thing for the people there &#8230; How do you have anonymmity and trust &#8230; that is a key thing,&#8221; he said.</p></blockquote>
<div class="posterous_quote_citation">via <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/02/tech/main5358982.shtml">cbsnews.com</a></div>
<p>These quotes from Evan Williams in this CBS News story are very intriguing.  I&#8217;m interested in these &#8220;reputation systems&#8221; that Twitter is developing, how they will be implemented, and their effectiveness.  What kind of systems can you think of that would address the complex intersections of anonymity and trust/credibility in an ecosystem like Twitter?  Is this a real need and how will the Twitterverse respond to the implementation of some sort of reputation system?</p></div>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via web</a> from <a href="http://posterous.markgammon.com/twitter-reputation-systems">markgammon</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markgammon.com/2009/10/twitter-reputation-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
